All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo a peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and relevance to the journal’s focus and scope.

The review process consists of several stages. First, the editor conducts an initial screening to assess the manuscript’s suitability, administrative completeness, and compliance with the author guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements may be rejected at this stage.

Second, manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to two or more reviewers with expertise relevant to the subject matter. The journal applies a double-blind review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

Third, reviewers provide evaluations and recommendations, which may include acceptance without revision, acceptance with minor revisions, acceptance with major revisions, or rejection. The editor communicates the review results to the authors.

Fourth, authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ comments within the specified time frame. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the reviewers for further evaluation if necessary.

The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of a manuscript rests with the editor, based on reviewers’ recommendations and editorial judgment.